Library
This library is a record of books that I’ve read, with a written response to each. There are no ratings here. I limit recommendations, and I do not write with the aim of reviewing. A book might make me think about something else, I may engage extensively with one passage, or I might evaluate the argument of the text as a whole. The texture of my responses will shift depending on the text.
One caveat: the write-ups from before 2024 read more like book reviews, because that’s what they were. Most started life on Goodreads, a few in graduate seminars, back before this site existed.
Some of my responses are short (perhaps a few paragraphs) while others may be entire essays. The amount written is a reflection not of the quality of the book, but of my own thinking.
My books are listed in reverse-chronological order by when I completed them. Each entry is listed in full bibliographic form, with a short annotation below. Some of these I own, others I do not.
2022
Pirajno, Alberto di. A Cure for Serpents. Eland, 2006.
Orientalist, but perspectives you can’t really find elsewhere; take it with a grain of salt.
al-Koni, Ibrahim. Gold Dust. Translated by Elliot Colla. Hoopoe, 2020.
The same satisfying Saharan Sufism, here about what one will do for a non-human companion.
By definition welcome: French attempts to close the extraterritoriality gap inadvertently galvanized Tunisian nationalism.
Gaddafi, Muammar. The Green Book. 2016.
Frankly, Gaddafi is a pretty garbage political theorist, and the political material is nonsense.
Saint-Exupéry de, Antoine. Wind, Sand and Stars. Harvest Books, 2002.
Good vignettes of early flight; you can feel the mythmaking emerge, and I love that.
Ben Hameda, Kamal. Under the Tripoli Sky. Translated by Adriana Hunter. Bath: Peirene Press, 2014.
A window into Tripoli’s gendered women’s spaces; by no means profound, but worth taking time with.
A great history of Libya through its genocidal “pacification”; in short, a classic.
Tushnet, Mark V. Why the Constitution Matters. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2010.
The constitution matters by defining how politics are practiced; nothing new, a summary of the widely known.
A scientific survey of the literature as of 2010; not light, but a great primer for further research.
Interesting and actionable, though I couldn’t help feeling I’m not the audience.
An excellent study of a supposedly sleepy period: the revolutionary tradition didn’t die with the Commune.
Small bureaucratic decisions culminated in opium prohibition; she shows when “global” history does not work.
A decolonial history of the Revolution as a wholly new lakou-built society; important scholarship.
An enlightening history of expanding executive war prerogative, with Congress just as at fault.
Kamrava, Mehran. A Concise History of Revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019.
Political science, not history: the three ideal types obscure as much as they illuminate.
The definitive text for a quick overview built out with other materials; not the place for depth.
Great popular history; nothing new for world historians, but I consumed it in one sitting.
Narrative commodity history rather than scholarly analysis; worth a read for a glimpse.
A great entry point to African diaspora history, though nothing new for those already familiar.
Emecheta, Buchi. Second Class Citizen. New York: George Braziller, 1983.
Brief and good on the multifaceted discrimination black immigrant women faced in 1960s Britain.
Hard to get through, but Green’s story makes sense to me; one to come back to.
Even more interesting than expected: Galata under Ottoman policy; a must-read for the early modern Mediterranean.
A very French study of why public executions disappeared; the theoretical debates crowd out the more important story.
Really dense, but “frontier governmentality” should reframe how I think through colonial history.
Provisional governments’ actual actions determine outcomes; a nice pushback against political science’s determinism; recommend.
Essays on aspects of the French extreme right; not the place to start, but great supplementary case studies.
Public history at its best: Natchez becoming a Disneyland for Lost Cause partisans; highly recommend.
Colonial psychiatry as a technology patients and families actively negotiated; recommend.
Spiegelman, Art. Maus: A Survivor's Tale: My Father Bleeds History. New York: Pantheon Books, 1986.
Woof, such a bleak story, made incredibly human; you feel Vladek and Anja’s increasing dread.
Great short chapters on medieval Africa; the lack of cohesion may be the point.
Shows Indigenous-French sign communication was rich, not basic; a must-read for colonial North America.
Historical scholarship at its best on why World War I so devastated the Ottoman Empire.
Really interesting research on Bulgaria’s Islamization, marred by ludicrously complex sentences.
Burnard, Trevor. The Atlantic in World History, 1490-1830. London: Bloomsbury Publishing, 2019.
A welcome undergraduate survey of Atlantic history proper, with a standout plantation-system chapter.
A tough read that respects the methodological problems of doing African history immensely.
James, Henry. The Bostonians. New York: Penguin Books, 2002.
Really beautiful writing, but the main characters are the actual worst and nothing happens at all.
Definitely the place to start; the real treasure is Oates’s biographical and contextual material.
The 16th-century conquest debates still predominate in Latin American literature; dense literary studies, and I’m not the audience.
Gross: “declensionist” and “developmentalist” are horribly useless categories, and the whole project an exercise in futility.
Once revisionist, now the dominant narrative: colonial religious life was vibrant and central.
Humoral theory made food fundamental to the colonial self; I learned a ton and highly recommend it.
A fascinating tome all historians should read, whatever they work on; highest recommendation.
Planter debt primed Virginians for revolution; illuminating, but I’d like more primary-source rigor.
No single colonial political experience, only distinct styles; worth reading, but very slow.
Boxer, Charles Ralph. The Portuguese Seaborne Empire, 1415-1825. London: Hutchinson, 1969.
Now this is a great book: the second half, on the sinews of empire, is excellent.
Limpieza de sangre crossed the Atlantic into the sistema de castas; really theory-heavy, but here it works.
Colonial America as the empire’s most royalist part; it made Bailyn click, though McConville overstates his case.
Impressive on how Andean religion shaped Spanish perception, but it wants readers better grounded in classical philosophy.
A very smart intellectual history of how Spain legitimated its American rule; very much a text for scholars.
Such a fun book: an illumination of colonial politics’ rough-and-tumble “dark side.”
Bailyn, Bernard. The Origins of American Politics. New York: Vintage Books, 1970.
Why the colonies revolted and Britain didn’t; worth skimming, not particularly comprehensive.
Illuminating material linking law to childhood in colonial Peru, though the overarching arguments stayed unclear to me.
Far more fascinating than I had any right to find it; a must-read on state-building and law.
Jackson, Helen Hunt. Ramona. New York: Signet Classics, 2002.
I’m sorry, but Ramona is trite: wooden, entirely stereotyped, without any sense of humanity.
Divine right and popular sovereignty are both fictions; great for the nitty-gritty of political thought.
Little new to me, but a great introduction to colonial South Carolina’s black majority.
Before citizenship, Spanish identity ran through vecindad and naturaleza, fluid uncodified categories; tough but illuminating.
Comparative slavery, Chesapeake against Lowcountry, handled with impressive subtlety; a must-read.
A good introductory synthesis to get your feet on the ground; nothing trailblazing.
The dialect poetry is where he really shines; favorites outdo the famous “Sympathy.”
Lynch, John. Bourbon Spain: 1700-1808. Basil Blackwell, 1989.
Almost entirely dynastic history; an adequate introduction, but the better text hasn’t been written yet.
Twain, Mark. Adventures of Huckleberry Finn. New York: Penguin Books, 2014.
Third read, first that worked: the dialect reads as craft, and Huck’s moral development is beautiful to see.
A short, interesting survey of indigenous women in Latin American history; a good starting point, not the end.
Ambitious, quasi-Marxist, hard to assess, but useful on the origins of Southern social structures.
Probably the oldest truly great history of American slavery, since surpassed but chock-full of detail.
Dives into Potosí’s city itself; markets just don’t interest me as much as labor systems.
Big, difficult, nearly comprehensive, but never looking beyond Bahia; not quite what I’d hoped.
The gold standard for historical writing on New World slavery; a must-read.
A good introduction to labor in early Potosí, but largely surpassed; Tandeter is superior.
Short and fascinating: compelling evidence that anti-black racism was produced, not eternal.
Spanish Americans didn’t initially seek independence, the imperial center imploded; a difficult text, not for newcomers.
Elliott, J.H. Imperial Spain 1469-1716. New York: Penguin Books, 2002.
Flawed and dated, with the Americas missing, yet one of the best on the market.
The creation story from hell, bleak and well told: American liberty and slavery rose together, inextricably linked.
Alcott, Louisa May. Little Women. London: Penguin Classics, 2012.
The most Protestant American novel I’ve read: heartwarming but so slow and episodic it lacked momentum.
Effectively Generations of Captivity with more regional detail; I may have wasted a bit of time.
Potosí would have been unprofitable without the mita; a slog, but illuminating on the mines’ social structure.
Broke my notions of a homogeneous Spanish America: Bourbon treatment of borderland peoples varied by where and when.
A monograph doubling as a really good overview of two realms under one Monarchy; I learned so much.
An illuminating study of legitimacy in 17th-century New England that gave me the narrative I lacked; highly recommend.
A leviathan reading independence as creole-peninsular competition; intellectual milieu can’t be the whole story.
A vision I like but overstated; a useful what-might-have-been that needs supplementing.
The Florentine Codex in four columns; a good collection of conquest sources from the Mexica perspective.
Dominguez, Jorge I. Insurrection or Loyalty. De Gruyter, 1980.
Interesting if obvious ideas in a structure that almost physically repels me.
The reframing is the contribution, largely successful: I see North American history from Indian perspectives much clearer now.
Smith, Tracy K. Life on Mars. Minneapolis, MN: Graywolf Press, 2011.
Family and social life couched in the language of astronomy, eliciting a real sense of wonder.
White, Richard. The Middle Ground. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.
Good historically, great theoretically: productive misunderstanding where no power was dominant, grounded spatially.
Myth-busting: English settlers found Natives a “mirror” of their own societies; the religion chapter fascinated me.
An excellent explanation of how a “mere stop-over” became a critical imperial node.
Contagious enthusiasm; the Catawbas discovered a “New World” just as much as Europeans did.
I’m sorry, but this book is really bad; do not recommend.
Jacobs, Harriet Ann. Incidents in the Life of a Slave Girl. New York: Barnes & Noble Classics, 2005.
Probably the most personally detailed slave narrative I’ve read; Jacobs has zero patience for slaveholders.
Sets the ground for White’s The Middle Ground; should be recognized as a classic.
A pioneering 1916 study, but trade is a bit of a sleepy topic, far surpassed by recent works.
Disjointed: the Jamestown claim is half-baked, but the analysis of English mental maps is bright and thorough.
Remarkably comprehensive on indigenous peoples in colonial Brazil, but emphasizing disease blinds readers to colonization’s brutality.
Morgan, Edmund S. Puritan Family. New York: Harper Perennial, 1942.
Dated but quite important, though Morgan’s hunt for a “bright side” to involuntary servitude rubs me the wrong way.
I honestly love this first American million-copy novel, balancing intrigue, action, and character-building at a nice clip.
Gobbled down in a day; a massive accomplishment that undervalues American pluralism.
Northup, Solomon. 12 Years a Slave. New York: Penguin Books, 2013.
Probably the most interesting slave narrative I’ve read, more thorough than Douglass; a must-read.
Profoundly dated lectures with no Spanish or African Atlantic: a serious problem.
A great study of Spanish rule in Yucatan whose most interesting Maya chapters feel like mere addition.
Poe’s greatness lives in short form; influential, but nearly two centuries on it doesn’t stand up.
Indian resistance that reads more as anthropology than history; I didn’t really “get it.”
Woof, a difficult read: not introductory, and it needs supplementing with Edmund Morgan.
Morgan, Edmund S. The Puritan Dilemma: The Story of John Winthrop. Boston: Longman, 1958.
A nice easy read that moved my image of the Puritans toward a far more dynamic people.
Dated and meant for specialists, but a fascinating cross-section and a really important read for me.
Cooper, James Fenimore. The Pioneers. New York: Penguin Books, 1988.
Sleep medicine masquerading as a book; Cooper simply is not a good writer.
Astounding work that foresaw environmental history; its contents are now received wisdom.
Wilkerson, Isabel. Caste: The Origins of Our Discontents. New York: Random House, 2020.
Race is a meta-language masking caste; a must-read, though the India and Reich comparisons stay skin-deep.
The Puritan attempt to shrink the visible church bred a purity obsession that collapsed the whole edifice.
Haig, Matt. The Midnight Library. Viking, 2020.
It didn’t cure my depression but helped some; the questions raised matter more than the story.
A synthetic text jam-packed with information: the US has almost never been isolationist, despite the rhetoric.
Racism destroys opportunities for the racists too; solutions verge on platitudes, but she’s right: required reading.
Erdrich, Louise. The Sentence. New York: Harper, 2021.
A testament to Erdrich’s ability that I rooted for a quite unlikable main character.
Powers, Richard. Bewilderment. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 2021.
Enamored by the first third, Robbie’s wonder so lifelike, before it becomes something more mundane.